Catching Up

A recent Twitter discussion (aka someone that has no idea what they are talking about) has prompted me to resume my post here as the unadulterated catching (and let's be frank, baseball) guru at VFC.

I love me some Posey, really I do, but that is an irresponsible and almost criminal statement by one of my followers. One that requires my re-entry into the blogosphere, so for your reading pleasure, away we go!

First things first, as far as catchers go it's Yadier Molina and then everyone else but my list is as follows:

1. Yadier Molina

1A. Buster Posey

2. Matt Wieters

Catching is a defense-first position. Therefore when talking about the top catcher, defense is where you start, and ultimately where you end. The following table are defensive stats compiled from the beginning of 2012 forward.

For the non-SABR-savvy here are the definitions according to FanGraphs for the table at left:

rSB: Calculated by The Fielding Bible, Stolen Base Runs Saved measures how many “runs” a catcher contributes to their team by throwing out runners and preventing runners from attempting steals in the first place.

RPP and rSB are both centered at zero meaning that anything above zero is above average. Anything below zero is below average. (Note +5 is considered Excellent for those two stats). In terms of throwing out runners (rSB) Molina has contributed 9 runs which comes in a tick above Wieters and a full +10 runs better than Posey.

 RPP: First calculated by Bojan Koprivica, Passed Pitch Runs (RPP) calculates the number of runs above / below average a catcher is at blocking pitches. 

Calculated Passed Pitches (CPP). This is another statistic derived from Bojan’s research, and it measures how many passed balls a catcher should have allowed based on his pitches seen.

Given that I used the stat for projected pass balls, I also included actual pass balls (PB) showing that each player is spectacular at blocking balls. Generally, in terms of RPP (blocking pitches), it will show that they are all close but Yadier Molina, yet again, comes in ahead of both players by .6 runs; in a two year sample size, saving 6.6 runs just by blocking pitches, let that sink in.

DRS: Defensive Runs Saved (DRS) is a defensive statistic calculated by The Fielding Bible, an organization run by John Dewan, that rates individual players as above or below average on defense. Much like UZR, players as measured in “runs” above or below average.

For a more complete definition of DRS, FanGraphs is a Godsend.

rGFP: A Good Fielding Play is recorded when a fielder does something to prevent an advancement or record an out that we wouldn't typically expect from a fielder at the position. It is a play that is made when, had the play not been made, no one would have faulted the fielder for not making it. There are currently 27 different types of Good Fielding Plays. rGFP is calculated in terms of runs.

In the last 2 years, Yadier Molina has contributed +24 runs behind the plate (+15 is considered Gold Glove Caliber) while Posey has saved just two runs and Wieters has been a negative player in terms of DRS during the same time frame. If this isn't enough to appreciate the landslide in which Molina is ahead of these two defensively he has added 4 runs worth of "Good Fielding Plays" in the two years while the others are negative run players in this category.

FSR: The Fan Scouting Report is a yearly project conducted by Tom Tango that rates players on their defensive ability based on fan observations and voting. Fans are asked to rate players on a 0-100 scale (with 100 being the best and 0 being the worst) in a number of different categories: Instinct, Speed, Hands, Arm Strength and Accuracy, First Step, etc. 

Fan Scouting isn't an exact science but with enough people's input you can usually gain a consensus as to how good each player is at the aforementioned tools. The metrics are the same as the Defensive Runs Saved (centered around zero, positive is above average, negative is below average). Molina has taken this category as well.

The fact that Buster Posey plays occasional games at first base is also a detriment to his attempt at the apex of catching. A far less physically demanding position and is basically a break on the legs for the day while Molina is THE catcher for the Cardinals and similarly for Wieters and the Orioles. Defensively it's not really close, It's Molina. But we shall look at the offensive side because there is always two sides to every argument.

Buster Posey was the rightful winner of the 2012 NL MVP award, he was the best all-around player in the National League last year, helped lead his team to the playoffs (voting takes place at the end of the season not after the World Series), and plays the most physically demanding position in baseball. Last year he was the best all-around player and catcher in the league. He was worth 1.5 more wins than Molina last year, and deservedly was the single most valuable player to his team which ultimately wont he World Series.

Molina this year despite spraining his knee, a death sentence for most catchers, has one more hit than Posey and leads in most offensive categories compared to the other two, despite playing in 15 fewer games as the San Francisco backstop. Both players are worth 44% more runs than league average (WRC+)  but Molina is leading or tied for the lead in most other offensive categories. Molina is having a spectacular offensive season, not as good as Posey's 2012, certainly better than his 2013, and is in the running for the NL MVP in 2013.

This year there is no question who the best all-around catcher is, its Yadier Molina and it's not really close. Given that defensively it's a landslide, his offensive performance is outperforming his peers despite playing in fewer games and his team is in the running for a playoff spot, Yadier takes the cake and probably the hardware as well.

Stay Tuned,
Norton

New Year's Prediction for the Boston Sporting Landscape

There are many thoughts that usually flood into my simple, yet complex mind, and they usually come in the form of predictions. However, I would be remiss if I didn't put these down on paper (e-paper?) just so that I can say, "I told you so" when I'm inevitably right. Let's hop to it:

Red Sox

• The Red Sox will make the playoffs and the Yankees will not. Everyone remembers the September version of the Red Sox which had Dustin Pedroia and a collection of Babe Ruth All-Stars (I'm looking at you Jarrod Saltalamacchia) but a healthy lineup without catastrophic injury after catastrophic injury goes a long way. They will make the playoffs but most likely get crushed by Anaheim at some point along the way.
• John Lackey will win at least 15 games. He has not been healthy at all since he came to Boston, but, a year removed from all of his physical, emotional and mental issues I think he comes back with renewed spirit and despite some demonstrative displays on the mound he will have his best season in a Red Sox uniform.
• Jon Lester will be an All-Star. Jon Lester is the linchpin to the upcoming season for the Red Sox. I think it was very telling when David Ortiz says that he is the one person that he expects a big turn around from. That, and I have a friendly wager with a VFC Couch Potato that says he'll be there.
• Will Middlebrooks will have the best offensive season of all Red Sox position players. Had he have been healthy the whole year he would have been second in the ROY running (no one was coming close to that Trout guy) and he will be the most dynamic offensive player in Beantown. I like him for .295 AVG, 26 HR 108 RBI.

Patriots

• The Patriots will re-sign both Wes Welker and Aqib Talib to contract extensions. Wes Welker is too instrumental to the offense and Tom Brady, I mean the Patriots, can not afford to let him go. Belichick has spent too many high draft picks on secondary help that is less than league average and Talib has that play maker mentality. He is a little rough around the edges but he should be signed if he can be fit under the cap after Welker's extension is done.
• Josh McDaniels is the heir apparent to Bill Belichick.  Bill Belichick's contract ends at the end of next year and it spoke volumes that they pulled him from St. Louis just before the Super Bowl last year and now when there are seven job openings including Philadelphia and Chicago (two very reputable, albeit mismanaged franchises) and he has said, "I like where I am". There is no doubt in my mind that McDaniels is the next head coach of the New England Patriots, but the question really is, when?
• The Patriots will win the Super Bowl. This is a team that was within a few minutes and a second horseshoe up Eli Manning's ass away from winning another Bowl last year. And this year they are better. There are only two teams that could possibly beat the Patriots and neither of them are in the AFC, San Francisco and Green Bay, but given the aforementioned Belichick statement above you wonder if this is close to a last hurrah, and I'm not betting against that man's game planning with something to prove one last time, if it is indeed one last time.

Celtics

• Avery Bradley is one of the pieces that the Celtics are missing. His on-ball defense is the best that I have seen since Bruce Bowen and if he can disrupt the passing lanes and add the energy that he gave the Celtics last year he should be good for a few more W's in the left hand column for Boston. That being said, he doesn't put them over the top.
• The Celtics will make an impact trade for a big man. The Celtics need someone that can rebound the ball and make an impact defensively. I don't know who it is, but I know that this man would be the difference in a playoff push for the Green. The Celtics have too much redundancy on their roster with all the two guards and they have an expendable piece in Brandon Bass that is unhappy with his current role (but can't be traded until January 15th or later). Do it Danny, get it done.
• Jared Sullinger needs to play more. I value Doc Rivers' talent evaluation like I value a medium rare steak (I value that with my life, don't go near my red meat) and when he says, "this kid doesn't play like a rookie" it doesn't get much higher praise for a first year player than that and he has a nose for the basketball. Especially now when the Celtics can't seem to get out of their own way some nights, this kid needs more PT.
• There is one more deep playoff run back in this team. This team is capable of beating any team any night but they need a legitimate big body that plays defense and rebounds. A healthy Avery Bradley neutralizes Dwayne Wade and then you have LeBron vs the rest of the Celtics and I'll take my chances.

Bruins

• Jeremy Jacobs needs to leave the Bruins organization. This is not a prediction, just an educated opinion. I'm not the biggest hockey fan but I am big on loyalty to a fan base, especially in Boston and the Boston Bruins owner is the man leading the charge in the continuation of this lockout. He is a hypocrite in the fact that he is an advocate for no deals longer than five years for players yet right before the lockout he OK'd a 6-year deal for Tyler Seguin. And he is still making money because he owns the TD Garden, so he could care less if the Bruins are on the ice or not. He is the main proponent that this lockout is going on and there are a lot of people in this region/country that want hockey back.

There it is, in concrete form for you all to ridicule and or stare at in astonishment, and most likely the latter. But I would like to take the time out to thank all the Couch Potatoes out there because without you I would just be another douche bag with an opinion. Here's to 2013.

Stay Tuned

Norton

What's Doing on Yawkey Way

There are a lot of questions surrounding the way the Red Sox have been conducting business in this off season entering 2013. To me, its simple, it's about two things, believing in the player development system (past and future) and not over-extending yourself for mediocre players/talent.

Any deal that totals three years or less in duration almost can not be viewed as a bad contract. Do not look at the AAV (average annual value) of the deal because the Red Sox were awarded a 'reset' button last July and have the money to spend. Are they overpaying? Absolutely. However ,coming off a last place finish, two miserable seasons in a row, and three seasons of not reaching October baseball the money has to speak and they have no choice but to overpay for some sort of incentive to come play in Beantown.
Most people are viewing Victorino, the newly signed Stephen Drew, Mike Napoli (if the deal gets completed), Johnny Gomes, and Koji Uehara as secondary talent. You would be correct. This is because they believe in the core of their team, when healthy, is still good. Dustin Pedroia, David Ortiz, Will Middlebrooks, Jon Lester, Clay Buchholz and Jacoby Ellsbury are the core of the team as currently constituted. They believe with the right manager at the front of the ship, and projecting players to play closer to their career norms rather than career worsts, they are capable of competing in the AL East. What they think was needed was complimentary players and depth instead of an overhaul and the sudden influx of cash has allowed them to go this route.

You'll notice that of all the players they've been signing, none of them have the stigma of losing compensatory draft picks after signing. This is also important because with those first two rounds they have had players come up through their system such as: Dustin Pedroia (2nd), Jon Lester (2nd), Justin Masterson (2nd), Clay Buchholz (1st), Jacoby Ellsbury (1st); just to name a few. So, they clearly feel that they can evaluate the top-end talent in a draft well. Therefore, you play to your strengths and load up (or not lose) the draft picks in the first couple rounds of the Draft.

The Red Sox have also upgraded their scouting department with the hiring of Eddie Bane as to not have to have the "bridge" years in the future and to re-develop the machine that was so bountiful with talent in the early 2000's. Eddie Bane was the talent evaluator in Anaheim that drafted Mike Trout, Kendrys Morales, Jered Weaver and Mark Trumbo. And before you say it, "what about the old draft busts, Brandon Wood and Dallas McPherson?" Bane was not part of that scouting team that inked those highly touted, but widely busted players, I looked it up.

The Ryan Dempster deal also pleases me because once again they got him for a minuscule two-year deal, it doesn't matter the money and it adds stability (has thrown 200+ innings in four out of the last five years with an average ERA of 3.73) to the back end of the rotation. This comes with a caveat though, if it all possible he needs to be handled with kid gloves when going up against the powerhouse offenses (Texas, Anaheim, Detroit and NYY). Which is why I would go with a pseudo-six-man rotation, and I would use someone like Franklin Morales or Alfredo Aceves as a spot starter so as to not over-expose the soft-throwing Dempster (average 2012 vFA: 89.6mph) to those lineups. If you go by the formula of 1-million dollars per win he should eclipse the 13 win plateau and therefore be worth his contract for the next two years.

While they have already signed Koji Uehara they should still be on the market for a late inning power reliever that could close if necessary. Which is why I think they need to pursue Joel Hanrahan to compete for the closer job. What they need is someone that throws hard and can put people away at the back end of the bullpen because Daniel Bard is not a sure thing right now, and my personal preference is to have power arms anchoring the bullpen.

Although his walk rate is up stockpiling fireballers at the back end of your bullpen is a recipe for success, and Hanrahan has had one of the leagues fastest fastballs for the past few years.

The other thing that the Red Sox are doing right now is putting a huge bunch of faith in their top prospects. There is nothing wrong with that, but it is extremely risky to think that every one of Bogaerts, Brentz, Bradley, Barnes and others are all going to pan out. But it shows that you have faith in the scouting and talent evaluation department which is the way to reload for the future.

These free agent deals are all deals that should serve as the perfect bridge to the next wave of the aforementioned "Killer B's".

Shane Victorino, three year deal. Ellsbury will be leaving at the end of the year (most likely) which gives the Red Sox leverage (can play center field, has speed, could hit lead off if need be) if you want to trade him, and also with Jackie Bradley Jr slotted for a late 2013 to early 2014 call-up the move doesn't block any ones progression unless for some reason they re-sign Ellsbury. There isn't much precedent though for letting a player get all the way through arbitration without signing them to a deal so I wouldn't anticipate them re-signing him at year's end.

Ryan Dempster, two year deal. Barnes will likely not be up with the big club until 2014 at the earliest which also would not impede any player's development.

Stephen Drew, classic Scott Boras one year "Pillow Contract". This should serve as a bridge to Bogaerts, but it also allows you to keep Iglesias in the minors to see if he can actually swing the stick because you still have to be able to hit your body weight in the majors, it doesn't matter how good your glove is. This might also be a sign that they have soured on Iglesias because they don't think he can hit. However he is still just 22 and has room/time to grow. Drew provides more balance to the lineup hitting from the left side, and should at least provide adequate defense.

David Ross, two year deal. Jarrod Saltalamacchia is a lumberjack playing catcher and shouldn't be allowed to put on a chest protector. Ryan Lavarnway whom the Red Sox should turn the reigns over to is still young and would need a veteran mentor catcher to learn from and Ross is as solid as they come defensively. Napoli shouldn't see many games behind the plate as the Red Sox don't have another first baseman that is really capable of playing there. Ross allows the flexibility to move Saltalamacchia, play Napoli solely at first base and play a more prominent role as a backup than most teams number two catchers.

These moves all look trivial right now, but the business model is sound because they have the money for it. I'll let the rest of the off season play out before I reserve judgement on the team but the allocating of funds is not something that I have a problem with, and you shouldn't either.

Stay Tuned

Norton

Sox Sign a First Baseman

Mike Napoli signs with the Red Sox for 3 years, 39 million (13 million per year)

First things first, the Sox are to be commended for being patient with the Mike Napoli signing and sticking to a three year deal instead of going for the fourth year, regardless of the higher AAV (average annual value). Given the current market of players, and the Red Sox financial situation this is the best thing for them to do, over pay for the players they want but do it on their terms with regard to length.

The Red Sox are actually doing intelligent business right now. They are building ridiculous depth given the rash of injuries that have happened the last three years. Not only that they are molding their lineup to fit their ballpark like the Yankees do, what the Red Sox have been lacking the last few years is power from the right side of the box. With a healthy Wil Middlebrooks, Napoli and Johnny Gomes (on a part-time basis) they finally have the thunder they need from that side of the plate.

I don't dislike the Napoli signing, but I think that some of the expectations need to be tempered. Much like with players such as Julio Lugo and Carl Crawford they killed the Red Sox before the became part of the team. Napoli won't be facing the Red Sox lackluster pitching of 2012 this year and will not have a .400 average at Fenway Park.

To me, this move also has a ripple effect, and I think it spells the end of Jarrod Saltalamacchia (Thank God). The Red Sox will not keep four catchers (David Ross, Ryan Lavarnway, Mike Napoli and Saltalamacchia) on the roster. Lavarnway has options left but he really doesn't have anything left to prove in AAA and is cheaper than Saltalamacchia (fiscal responsibility, remember?), Ross was signed to a 2-year deal and Napoli is too similar to Saltalamacchia to have in the same lineup.

Not only were their peripherals nearly identical in HR, R, RBI and WAR, but they are both minus defenders to boot, Napoli moreso than Saltalmacchia at catcher. Napoli however, walks a lot more than Saltalamacchia along with being able to play first base makes him more valuable because of his ability to get on base more and play another position. 2012 was a down year for Napoli in a lot of categories and I actually believe he will have a slightly better year average-wise (probably closer to .250) which will in turn bump up the OBP over .350.

As previously stated the Red Sox are conducting smarter business in structuring their team to fit the ballpark, however they are taking a calculated risk in 2012. The Red Sox have sacrificed defense at 1B and LF in Napoli and Gomes respectively, which is a gamble, but thinking along those lines it would make sense that they sign a plus defender to be in right field, and given the way the market is shaping up, I expect the Red Sox to sign Shane Victorino whom plays a Gold Glove quality right field. Let's look at the three players defensively:

Above is the total number of innings they've played at those positions during their Major League careers and easily what can be deduced is that Gomes is a butcher. But they are hoping that the HR production/Fenway wall will negate how porous he is defensively. Napoli is a slightly below average fielder at first base which means that Middlebrooks is really going to have to work on his throws across the diamond because Gonzalez isn't there to bail him out anymore, but he shouldn't cost many runs over the course of the year. Knowing that Fenway's right field is one of the most difficult in all of baseball to play, they almost have no choice but to go get a defensive stud and Victorino certainly fits that bill, add in the fact that he's a switch hitter with speed, he fits anywhere in the lineup.

Things are finally shaping up in Beantown and the Red Sox are making sound fiscal business decisions. There may be light at the end of this tunnel, and it may not be that long before they find it.

Stay Tuned

Norton

Rounding the Bases and an AL MVP Debacle

It seems to be a never-ending update with little to show thus far for the Red Sox as far as "winning the off season" but they are sticking to a method and that is to be commended. I'm also going to wax poetically on why the BBWAA is the biggest group of knuckleheads this side of the mighty Missus-Sip And away we go...

The Blue Jays Acquire an Ace a Number 3 and a cornerstone shortstop-

I'm not going to lie to ya'll, it cuts deep as a Sox fan when a division rival pulls off a blockbuster for what would seem to amount to pennies, but I'm glad the Red Sox, whom were in discussions for the same deal, passed on this one, because according to sources the Marlins asked for Middlebrooks, Bogaerts and Doubront which is absolutely not a good deal for Boston.

This move, with the teams currently constituted as they are, doesn't put the Blue Jays at the forefront of the AL EAST but what it does is add more parity to a very competitive division. What I mean by this is that it is widely-known that it usually takes 95 wins to win the division. With the additions that Toronto has made it should allow for them not to be a punching bag and could allow for as much as 3 less wins for whichever team wins the AL East.

As of right now my standings look like this:

Tampa Bay Rays

New York Yankees

Toronto Blue Jays

Boston Red Sox

Baltimore Orioles

Whoa, what did he just say? Yes I put the Orioles in last place in the division because as of right now, I believe that they were a fluke and the slapstick pitching staff they had was more of an anomaly than the start of something big. The Orioles were a staggering 29-9 in one run games last year and I believe that their accomplishments are going to be hard to duplicate and unless the obtain at least one premium starter that they will regress significantly.

Buck Showalter did a masterful job with his bullpen but knowing the volatility of relievers from year to year I am not willing to put them ahead of a healthy Red Sox team that is going to be far better with the right manager. This is not to say that the Orioles will not compete. The AL East might be the most balanced and competitive division when the off season is all said and done.

I still like the Red Sox pitching despite a down year more than the Orioles staff and the impact of a healthy Ortiz, Middlebrooks and (possibly?) motivated Ellsbury going into his walk year. I am calling the Sox and Orioles offense equal as of right now, but I still give the edge on the bump to Boston.

The Red Sox lack of a Hitting Coach

The Red Sox are still in the process of hiring a hitting coach and until he signed with the Marlins, Tino Martinez was rumored to be in the running for that post which in my opinion would have been a very good outside the box hire.

However, it's time to get a body in here, and my vote is for Rudy Jaramillo. He was the hitting coach for all of those powerful lineups in Texas for the last decade and a half. He has the pedigree to handle any ego that is still left in Boston and the experience to command respect that a man at that post deserves.

A Pre-Emptive Extension for Dustin Pedroia

This is a spectacular development for Boston from every standpoint. Pedroia despite a little bump in the road mostly attributed to an inept manager is everything that embodies what you want in a baseball player and it makes business sense. He has two years left on his deal and Robinson Cano is due to hit the market in 2013, so by signing him now to your price, you don't have to use Cano as a barometer for Pedroia's contract.

So right now the benchmark for Pedroia is Ian Kinsler's 5 year 75 million dollar deal. I think a five year pact is a good place to start and 80 million dollars which would make him the highest paid 2B in terms of AAV at the time of the contract which will for sure drive Cano's contract up and hopefully financially tie the hands of the Yankees with the new luxury tax rules.


Miguel Cabrera over Mike Trout is a Travesty

Miguel Cabrera had a spectacular offensive season and I will not take that from him. However, Miguel Cabrera winning the Most RBI Award, I mean the MVP Award is the most irresponsible vote of all time. If you want to talk about the value of a player there are three facets of baseball, there is hitting, fielding, and base running.

Here's the breakdown:

(Sidenote: You will notice that RBI is not on this chart because RBI is a pointless statistic that has more to do with ancillary team accomplishments compared to individual performance.)

Mike Trout had an unparallelled season in the history of baseball. No player in baseball history has ever hit 30 HR, scored more than 120 runs and stolen more than 45 bases in one season. He had the highest WAR over the course of a season since a guy named Barry Bonds in 2004 but if you want to go with someone without a PED past than you're looking at Albert Pujols in 2003 and before that Griffey Jr. in 1996. You're talking about one of the Top 10 non-steroid seasons in the last 30 years in terms of WAR

If you want to talk about Cabrera "carrying his team to the playoffs" you are completely ignoring the fact that the Angels had one, a better record than Detroit with 89 and 88 wins respectively. Two, the fact that the Tigers got to play the Royals and Twins to end their season along with almost twenty times a piece throughout the year. Three, saying that Cabrera did it alone is to completely degrade the contributions of Austin Jackson, Prince Fielder, Justin Verlander and Max Scherzer who all had great seasons as well. The Angels by and large faced a lot stiffer competition throughout the year which certainly can't be overlooked.

The real advantage that Cabrera had is that he played about 3 weeks more games than Trout did. That is not to go unnoticed, however, despite that 3 week discrepancy Trout had one more walk in three weeks less time at the plate. When talking about value at the plate the worst thing you can do at the plate is not strike out, the worst thing you can do is ground into a double play, because the name of the game is not making outs and making two outs in one at bat is worse than one. With that knowledge Cabrera grounded into 28 double plays to Trout's 7. If my math is correct that is a 300% increase in double plays grounded into thus creating two outs with one swing instead of one.

Anyone that says Cabrera was "OK" at third base has never watched a baseball game plain and simple. Moving to third base for the sake of the team is admirable, but that has no bearing on an MVP vote and his defense, or lack there of was atrocious. If the ball was hit right at him, and not to either the left or right he would make the play, he has a good arm, but his lack of range severely hurt the Detroit pitching staff throughout the course of the year. Mike Trout played a more difficult defensive position but let's let the numbers speak for themselves:

Both players played different positions for their team so this doesn't take into account Cabrera at 1B or Trout in LF or RF but both of their primary positions. The other caveat is that CF is the more difficult position, not by a lot, but you have more ground to cover and many more angles to play than thrid base. As you can clearly see, Mike Trout in the DRS (Defensive Runs Saved) saved 23 runs as opposed to Cabrera who essentially let 4 runs in defensively over the course of the season.

RZR is defined by Fangraphs as:

Revised Zone Rating (RZR) measures, “the proportion of balls hit into a fielder’s zone that he successfully converted into an out”

Think of these as a percentage like a grade in high school Mike Trout got a 95 which is an A while Miguel Cabrera got either a D- or an F.

The Out of Zone rating had Mike Trout make more than double the amount of plays outside of his "zone" on defense in three weeks less time mind you. As far as all of the other zone ratings he is literally double the defensive player that Cabrera is, so I'll just let you continue to digest the landslide that took place while standing in the field.

Value is something that should be looked at thoroughly for the three aspects of the game of baseball and the archaic Baseball Writers Association of America members need a refresher course to get a better understanding of the game. Ultimately had Mike Trout hit one percentage point higher than Miguel Cabrera he would have been a landslide victory so for him to lose in a landslide is a travesty.

Stay Tuned

Norton