Wednesday, November 30, 2011
NFL Playoff Picture Part II: NFC
I Hate Valentine's Day
Cherington, decidely started out running the process when he had that list of five people (Sandy Alomar Jr., Dale Sveum, Gene Lamont, Pete Mackanin and Torey Lovullo). He also went as far as to say, "our manager will be one of these five candidates." These choices seem logical for a first time GM. You've got a big name former player (Alomar), 2 guys with some, but limited managerial experience but have ties to Boston (Lamont and Sveum), A long-time bench coach (Mackanin) and then the AAA manager in your farm system (Lovullo). Then a mystery candidate was floated about, Valentine, which clearly was Larry's way of saying I'd rather hire my guy but we'll let you run your search. But here's my question, If Cherington is the one that is actually conducting the managerial search why would he bold-face lie to the media? Answer: He wouldn't Larry Lucchino just overruled Cherington's "authority"
It was clear that Cherry's binky was Dale Sveum, but somewhere during that formal lunch with ownership Sveum pissed in Larry Lucchino's minestrone soup and their relationship couldn't be rekindled. I'm not entirely sure who is the person at fault here. Is it Cherry for being a bad judge of character? Or is it Lucchino for being to picky and dismissive of Ben's selection. I'm bias because I think Lucchino is a snake, but I'll lean on Cherington's side especially when Theo immediately offered Sveum a position as the Cubs manager.
In Major League Baseball, being a manager is 65% managing of egos, 35% baseball strategy. It's going to be tough managing egos when your manager has the biggest ego out of any of the players on the team. Let's look at positives and negatives:
Positives
- He believes in being physically fit. His time in Japan showed him that chicken and beer is probably not the best way to win ballgames.
- He believes in discipline. I am also a believer that players of any sport need structure.
- He is not opposed to sabermetrics and the use of advanced statistics in decision making for his ballclub.
- He clearly likes to talk, but when his blabbering throws his players under the bus is alarming to me. You'll remember when Valentine first joined the Mets, Todd Hundley was one of the team's biggest stars. Without knowing the whole situation Bobby Valentine spouted off to the media that he thought Hundley was out boozing at night and needed to get more sleep. Well Mr. Valentine you're right he did need to get more sleep because after games he was driving to see his mother who was battling heart disease, a father with a hip replacement and a pregnant wife. Open Mouth, insert foot, Mr. Valentine.
- To me, he doesn't have the clout that he thinks he has. He has managed 15 seasons in the Majors and only twice has he won 90 games, and he has won one pennant (but lost the World Series 4-1 to the Yankees), while never winning a division title. To those that say, Francona didn't win anything either, Bobby Valentine's Texas Rangers and New York Mets had much better rosters than ANY that Francona had to deal with and Philadelphia.
- His strong personality is his best and worst trait. He has butted heads with management in all of his managing gigs (I'll give him a pass for butting heads in Japan, because they didn't pay him and I'd be pretty miffed as well), which is why I don't see his shelf life being long especially with Joe Maddon being available at the end of 2012 and John Farrell at the end of 2013.
The one overwhelmingly positive thing that I will say about the Red Sox during the current ownership's tenure is that they aren't afraid to think big/outside the box. Precisely what they were doing when they tried to pry Farrell away from Toronto. Farrell is the man I would have selected for this job, and stopped at nothing to make it happen.
At first Toronto was going to let him go, and then they (smartly) pulled a 180 and said, we will not allow lateral moves without legitimate compensation. They asked for Clay Buchholz. I would scoff at this too, but then I thought, "Ya know what could help? The Theo compensation."
You could have thrown a few minor leaguers as fillers in the deal (Doubront, Reddick and another pitcher not A+ prospects) because you have the Cubs over a barrell as much as Theo doesn't want to admit it, and demanded Matt Garza.
Then you can propose sending Matt Garza (instead of Buccholz) to the Jays who is battle tested in the AL East, has no-hit stuff, and has been healthier than Clay Buchholz throughout his career. The splits are pretty close
Or maybe you keep Garza and let Buchholz go. "SACRILEGE! HE'S THE BEST PITCHA WE GOT!" *obnoxious Boston-accent* Garza is every bit as good as Buchholz albeit a year older than him, and doesn't have the injury risk that Buchholz has the last 3 years. Garza has always pitched for teams that haven't given him a lot of run support, which speaks to his almost .500 winning percentage but largely better all-around numbers in almost double the amount of appearances. The Red Sox needed quality innings last year and flat out didn't get them. Buchholz has never thrown 180 innings in a year and the starting rotation needs quality length, somethin Buchholz is not a lock for. With Garza you can write it in with Sharpie that he's going to make 33+ starts and throw around 200 innings.
Cubs Get: Theo Epstein, Felix Doubront, Reddick and PTBNL
Jays Get: Garza or Buchholz
Red Sox Get: Farrell and Garza or keep Buccholz
If you want something/someone and you have the means to do it, you need to go out and get it done.
Stay Tuned,
Norton
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
NFL Playoff Picture Getting Clearer: AFC Breakdown
We’re now through 12 weeks and the playoff race in the AFC has started to take a more definitive shape. There are 9 teams vying for 6 spots, the cutoff is the Bills at 10 so sorry Buffalo but losing 4 in a row and your top offensive player in Fred Jackson doesn’t allow you to be vying for a playoff spot anymore. Of those 9 teams the Bengals, Broncos, and Titans all appear to shift from week to week on whether they are pretenders or contenders. I know that Denver starts Tim Tebow at quarterback and shouldn’t really be in this conversation but there’s not much else to say other than he’s 5-1 as a starter and the team, mostly the defense, rallies around him more and more each week. They can’t score a lick and I’m pretty sure John Fox has Tebow running a dumbed down version of the offense from “Football for Dumbies” but a win is a win. Back to the subject at hand this isn’t going to be a rant or rave about Tim Tebow but a look at all the teams, here is how the AFC top 9 line up currently:
1. Houston Texans (8-3)
2. New England Patriots (8-3)
3. Baltimore Ravens (8-3)
4. Oakland Raiders (7-4)
5. Pittsburgh Steelers (8-3)
6. Cincinnati Bengals (7-4)
7. New York Jets (6-5)
8. Denver Broncos (6-5)
9. Tennessee Titans (6-5)
Now let’s break these standings down and I’m going to throw at you how I think this race is going to shake out.
You are seeing straight that is the Houston Texans sitting in the top slot. A franchise that has never had a winning record is currently your number one seed though I see that changing in the near future with the news that Matt Leinart is out for the year and the team just signed Jake “Day Light Come And I Wanna” Delhomme. The Texans are still going to win the weak AFC South but I don’t see them holding onto the top spot over the likes of the Patriots and Steelers. They’ll settle in nicely to the 3 seed ahead of the (spoiler alert!) AFC West champion Oakland Raiders. The other shoo-ins as far as this blogger is concerned are the Patriots, Ravens, and Steelers. Those three teams know how to win when the mercury drops below 32 and the calendar turns to January, I don’t see that changing this year. All three sit at 8-3 with each having the possibility of running the table. The Patriots play an extremely weak schedule the last 5 weeks of the year so I see them penciling in as the 1 seed with a 13-3 final tally. The Steelers and Ravens will battle it out for the other bye and the 2 seed. I’m going to lean towards the Ravens since they’ve already beaten the Steelers twice thus owning the tiebreaker. All they have to do is play the Steelers even down the stretch and they get the coveted bye through the wildcard weekend. Steelers will finish either 12-4 or 11-5 securing themselves the 5 seed behind the 4 division winners. Between the Patriots, Ravens, Texans, and Steelers that’s four spots out of six locked down let’s take a peek at who might grab those final two openings.
Handicapping The Rest of the Field
We’ve now decided the definite lets look at who’s left and who is going to punch a ticket to the dance and who’s going to be left out in the cold. I’m going to eliminate the Tennessee Titans from the race right off the bat. CJ1K has been a ghost all year and has only had two really good games all year and they came against the porous run defenses of the Tampa Bay Bucs and Carolina Panthers. Against everyone else he’s struggled to break the 40-yard mark while Matt Hasselbeck has been firing off interceptions like it’s going out of style. They still have games against the Saints and Texans left I don’t see them cracking the 10 wins it takes to even sniff the playoffs. Titans are off the list.
Next team up that I’m going to eliminate is those pesky Denver Broncos. There hasn’t been a simpler offense run in the NFL since the ball was oval shaped and passing was considered awkward at best. The Broncos beat the Chiefs a few weeks ago after attempting only 8 passes, completing 2, and running the ball 55 times. This week they beat the free falling Chargers in OT with Tebow completing 9-18 and running the ball over 20 times. I personally fall under the belief that it’s more of an indictment on the Chargers and Chiefs not playing well than the belief that this high school option offense will have continued success at the NFL level. There’s a reason that option quarterbacks don’t transition from college to the pros if they did the quarterbacks of Army, Navy, and the Air Force would all be top 10 picks. Tebow is winning now but teams will realize he’s not a threat to pass the ball effectively and the magic will run out. Broncos land on the outside looking in.
Eliminating the Broncos means that I’m crowning the Oakland Raiders the AFC West champions as I mentioned a few paragraphs above. The Raiders have actually been playing halfway decent with Carson Palmer steering the ship and Michael Bush picking up the slack while Run DMC’s foot heals. When the Raiders get him back and have their entire WR corps healthy the Raiders will stand a punchers chance moving forward. They can hold off the Broncos and their Tebowing. They’re in as AFC West champions and the 4 seed.
Then there were two…the current 6 seed Cincinnati Bengals and the 7 seed New York Jets. It kills me to say this as a diehard Pats fan but I’m going to concede the 6 seed to the Jets in the end. They have an easier schedule down the stretch than the Bengals and though Mark Sanchez has done nothing to show he has a semblance of consistency he’s been to the AFC Championship game twice and can somewhat handle playing under stress. The Bengals are lead by a rookie quarterback who has exceeded all expectations in the redheaded fireball Andy Dalton. Dalton has had an extraordinary season by all accounts but I don’t think he can beat the Texans, Steelers and Ravens down the stretch while the Jets get the likes of the Redskins, Chiefs, reeling Eagles, Giants, and Dolphins. The Jets have a pretty good shot at winning out whereas the Bengals would do well to win 2 out of 3 of those games, their other two games are against the Rams and Cardinals I’m going to chalk those up as W’s. The Bengals have had a much better year than anticipated in year 1 of the Dalton experience and I think next year they’ll be dancing with the big boys but this year they’re going to be left waiting for a prom date. Jets wrap up the 6th seed and if there’s justice for being obnoxious ego inflated pricks they’ll be bounced in round 1 by the Texans. If not then hopefully the Steelers or Ravens can serve them papers in round 2.
There you have it folks that’s why I see the AFC playoff race playing out and stay tuned for my take on the NFC race tomorrow night. Let me know what you think.
Geoff Jablonski
How To Fix A Team in a Month
Monday, November 28, 2011
Justin Lang's College Hoops Report: Feast Week
Sunday, November 27, 2011
Week 12 Thoughts
- Caleb Hanie / Jay Cutler: 75-1
- Matt Leinart / Matt Schaub: 60-1
- Vince Young / Mike Vick: 40-1
- Mark Sanchez / The Bench: 25-1
- Matt Moore / Chad Henne: 10-1
- Blaine Gabbert / Anyone the Jags draft next year: 10-1
- Tyler Palko / Matt Cassel: Off the Board
Thursday, November 24, 2011
I’m Thankful for the Boston Bruins 10 game-winning streak and Milan Lucic winning the decision over Paul Gaustad
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Conventionalism Finally Thrown out the Window
The people that live by the "pitchers have their own award" mantra are clearly ill-informed, uneducated and narrow-minded. Position players have their own awards too: Hank Aaron Award (Most Outstanding Offensive Player in each league), Silver Sluggers (Top Offensive Performers by position), and Gold Gloves (Best Fielders by position). The Most Valuable Player Award should be given to the player that represents the most overall value to their team and this year their was no player who provided more value than Justin Verlander.
Here are Justin Verlander's peripheral stats:
Justin Verlander made 34 starts. He pitched in 251 of 306 possible innings in his 34 starts, assuming a 9 inning game. (55 innings that Verlander didn't pitch divided by the number of starts (34) is approximately 1 2/3 or five outs). Detroits bullpen was asked to get five outs per game on the days he pitches. That is tremendously valuable both on the day that he pitches and for the two days after it. Think about that Red Sox fans, he threw into the 8th inning on average every start this year, that is by definition, a Horse.
I am a believer that leading a team to the postseason should weigh heavily on your candidacy for Most Valuable Player. The Tigers had the second best record in the American League and won their division by 15 games. If an average pitcher wins 10-12 games (we'll say 10 for arguments sake) he won 14 more games than a regular pitcher and propelled his team to the post season. He was 16-3 after a Tigers loss. Unfortunately for Ellsbury, his team finished 3rd in the division and did not qualify for October baseball. Maybe Ellsbury should head out and by a few pale ales for Beckett and Lester for all their help in his MVP campaign?
Another (weak) argument against Verlander is that he pitched in a light-hitting AL Central division and therefore padded his stats. You can't discount a player for his schedule, he didn't choose it. You wouldn't take Ellsbury's numbers against Baltimore's AAA pitching staff and throw them out the window, would you? Here are Verlander's averages against the other 3 playoff teams and the Red Sox from 2011:
Just for kicks and grins, let's look at Ellsbury's numbers with and without the Baltimore numbers just to see the stat padding at the hands of the Uh-O's.
With Baltimore
Without Baltimore
While still a fine statistical season, Baltimore bolstered his statistics spectacularly and his sans-Baltimore numbers look far more good, than great. So the schedule nazi's should probably pipe down.
I will not even begin to argue that pitching every 5 days is more grueling and taxing on the body than playing 162 games (or close to it), because it's not. But it should take a special case for a pitcher to win the MVP award and Verlander was that special case. And everyone here at The Couch, knows it.
Stay TunedNorton
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Fantasy Forum Week 11: Studs/Duds with a little Sleeper action
Friday, November 18, 2011
And on the 6th day God Created: Tim Tebow
We'll get to that beautiful Adonis, Tim Tebow in just a few short bars here, but like always, I had a few sports thoughts that have been percolating in my head. And forgive me if they ramble because the hamster that runs on his wheel up there has been running low on food for about 2 weeks now so you never honestly know what's going to come out. So, without further ado…
- One of my esteemed cohorts wrote a great piece chronicling the big news in the MLB that broke yesterday including the addition of 1 more playoff team per league. While he liked the addition I do not. It takes away from the race for that one elusive non division-winning playoff spot. Ask yourself this: With the way the Red Sox played down the stretch in September do you think they should have been entitled to that 5th and final spot? That would seem to really have watered down the improbable feat that Tampa accomplished. Don't get me wrong, I love "Game 163" when two teams are tied and I believe a one game playoff is the right move. But, let's say the Red Sox win 95 games next year and the next closest is the Tigers at 88 and because the Tigers know they are going to get in, they save Verlander for that one game playoff. Seems flawed. However, mark me down as in favor if it's a 3 game series. Baseball isn't like football and shouldn't be decided after one game, you play 3-4 game series' all year why would you change it for the playoffs? You start the 3 game series the day after the regular season (always ends on a Sunday) and it would be Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. You give the team with the better record the option of having Games 1 and 3 or 2 and 3 at home. That way both teams are at least guaranteed one playoff game at their respective home parks. Also you would start the next round on Thursday so it would give a decided advantage to the Division winners that they don't have to play potentially 8-10 games in a row leading up to the end of the season.
- For anyone who has been concerned about my health, thank you! It's been a rough go since Heidi Watney left but the Zoloft and Jack Daniels has really been a great coping vehicle. Good bye, sweet Moon Goddess.
- Maybe I'm reading too much into this (who, me?) but why let Ben Cherington go through an entire process of interviewing people if Larry Lucchino is just going to impose his own opinion on who should be the next manager of the Sox? Why hire a GM if Larry Lucchino is going to once again be the one running the show? It's awfully telling that Cherington will be in Cuba next week scouting Yoenis Cespedes, while the Sox brass is going to hold their own interviews with Bobby Valentine.
- Speaking of Cespedes if you haven't seen the spectacle that was his recruit video it's quite amusing. Horrible editing and special effects aside this guy has tools. I said on our fan page that he reminds me a LOT of Vladimir Guerrero in his prime. He has a plus arm, good speed and power to all fields. He says he's 26, you never quite know with some of their Crayola written birth certificates down there, but odds are he's definitely on the right side of 30 and he'll probably cost less than most of the other outfield options available. (Speculation is that his deal will be somewhat comparable to Aroldis Chapman's deal from 2 years ago, 6 years 30.25 million). Best of all he's right-handed. I expect the Red Sox to be big players for his services.
- I loved Ryan Miller playing for Team USA, he was phenomenal. But is he serious about the Lucic hit? You come out of your crease by 20 feet, and expect to not get railroaded? You're a hockey player, act like one.
- Rob Gronkowski, best tight end in football?
- I am not just saying this because I don't like the Jets but at what point do they have to think about drafting a new quarterback? Sanchez is just flat out horrible. Are Patriots fans spoiled because you have one of the top 3 quarterbacks all-time on their team? Yes, absolutely! But Sanchez can't get out of his own way. He is a horrible time manager, he has trouble hitting wide open receivers, and tries to force balls into double coverage regularly. He was taken out of college too early and didn't get the time to develop some of those attributes. That may ultimately be his downfall.
- As much as I wanted Jonathan Papelbon to stay as part of my plan, I am glad they let him go for the exorbitant contract the Phillies they just gave him. I do not want to get in the business of paying a closer 13 million a year for 4 innings of work per week. I'm also not comfortable (yet) with anointing Bard as the closer. I say we bring in a stable of power arms and let them duke it out in Spring Training. Although he isn't the power arm he was, I would also like to take a flyer on Joe Nathan who said he doesn't necessarily have to be a closer.
- Did anyone else hear the ludicrous statement that Time Wakefield's agent spewed the other day? "He loves being a Red Sock but if for some reason they don't feel like he can play, well he's going to win 15 games somewhere else and show them that, once again, they've underestimated him." Tim Wakefield, 15 game winner, verbal diarrhea at its finest.
- The other big announcement was that the Astros will be moving to the AL which creates two 15 team leagues. You know who this will adversely affect? David Ortiz. There are going to be more Interleague games now with a more balanced schedule and a player that is solely a DH is going to have a difficult time to find a home unless you can find a team willing to put him at first base regularly. The Red Sox will not be that team unless he takes a humongous hometown discount.
Alright I've put it off for too long. Tim Tebow is an absolute demi-god. Look here, I'm not gay or anything, but if my wife told me she was going to leave me and hook up with Tim Tebow I would demand vivid details and listen to them while eating bon-bons and probably consider throwing on some Lauper.
As far as just the passing part of his game, it's subpar, Tim himself will admit that. But, he knows what his skill-set is and he utilizes his specific skills more than just about any player in the entire league. But the one thing he is particularly skilled at is decision making, we'll call this, The Jesus Trait. He doesn't force balls anywhere they shouldn't go, Jerry Sandusky take note of that (too soon?). He knows that his team doesn't lose the ball if he throws an incompletion but if he forces a ball into tight coverage and it gets intercepted, he can't use his superhuman powers to win everything that comes into his grasp.
Another positive of the inauguration of the Tebow Era is that the SPCA can rejoice in the fact that there is a new running quarterback in town (yes, that was a cheap Mike Vick dog joke, sue me). His running style will inevitably take a toll on his body, but last night won him a game against the Jets whose questionable up the middle blitz forced Tebow out of the pocket (shouldn't they be attempting to keep him in the pocket? Blitz from the edge not the gut, just a thought.) Side note: Darelle Revis called out Tebow leading up to the game saying he'd be "bored" and that last run for the go-ahead TD he was thinking about going out of bounds and saw Revis and took it right at him. Pretty much a middle finger right to the best defensive player in football, but Lord knows a good Christian boy like him would never actually do that.
Ok, all this hob-knobbing aside, I can do without his press conferences after the game, which are more like sermons and inspirational Richard Simmons movies than that of a player delivering his postgame synopses. His dreamy eyes are enough to melt my heart but when he opens his mouth I'd rather gauge my ears out with a rusty spoon.
Whether he's Richard Simmons or Steve Young-reincarnate he and his team know that if the game is within reach Tim Tebow will find a way to win it. Who cares if the way he does it is uglier than sin, I'd rather win ugly than lose pretty.
Stay Tuned
Norton
Thursday, November 17, 2011
Theo’s last gift to the Red Sox and the Astros head West
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
The Sandusky Files
After reading the GJT there is only one word that is coming to my mind regarding Jerry Sandusky, evil. Pure, unadulterated evil. Look I'm in the business of believing the old "innocent until proven guilty" mantra but as far as I'm concerned the testimony of a Grand Jury is enough proof for me to gather an educated opinion.
Just in the GJT there were seven victims, (he was arrested for 40 counts over a span of 15 years) all of them associated with the Second Mile organization, a charity that he founded in 1977. This is an organization that takes "at-risk" youths and tries to give them advantages that their home life would not afford them. Think about it, what better place to try and prey on young people, in this case boys, than ones that have a broken home life more specifically boys with no male presence at home.
This man used his position of power, Defensive Coordinator at PSU and founder of Second Mile, to try and force his way into these boys' lives. Buying them gifts, taking them to games, giving them money, being a "mentor" and even going so far as to guarantee one of his Victims a spot on PSU's football team as a walk-on.
The one constant with every victim in the GJT was, the Second Mile. Seems like the perfect cover-up for a pedophile no? Start a foundation to help kids when really it's just a feeding ground for a pervert to stalk and victimize children.
Mark Madden also reported on Dennis and Callahan that an investigative report is being done on the Second Mile that pointed to him "pimping out young kids to rich donors".
Joe Paterno
The problem with this was that too many people started finding out about the black mark on Joe Paterno's staff. Joe Paterno was made aware of Sandusky's acts of indiscretion and to Paterno's credit he did tell his superior, but when his superior essentially gave Sandusky a slap on the wrist by barring him from the showers with children he should have done more. A lot more.
There are certainly a few questions that Paterno needs to answer:
- Why was Sandusky still allowed to recruit for PSU? He was in the facility as late as the fall of 2011 using PSU showers (this time not with young boys).
- What exactly was said to Paterno by McQueary?
- Why not involve the police?
- When did Paterno first find this out, because what McQueary witnessed was probably not the first act of this nature?
It also seems strange that all of this suddenly comes out the day after Joe Paterno gets win number 409, one victory more than Eddie Robinson, to take sole possession of first place on the all-time list.
Mike McQueary
Mike McQueary is slowly being crucified, when in reality he isn't the villain here.
Mike McQueary according to the GJT walked into the locker room at around 9:30 PM to drop off a pair of shoes when he heard "rhythmic slapping" coming from the shower. We all know the kind of sounds he's talking about, skin on skin. He peered into the shower to see a young boy who looked to be about 10-11 years old with his palms on the shower wall and a naked Sandusky behind him. I will not elaborate any further.
Immediately he left, called his father, and left the premises. Here's his first mistake, at the time, McQueary was 27 not very recently removed from playing college football and Jerry Sandusky was in his mid-50's. He should have confronted Sandusky. More than confronted, he should have beaten him within an inch of his life, but at the very least he should have gotten the child out of harm's way. He didn't do that.
He told his superior, point for McQueary, but when his superior really didn't do much of anything either he should have gone to the authorities. If he was worried about his job it shouldn't matter. It is about moral integrity. He would have been made a hero and would have found work somewhere else.
The simple fact that he didn't help a clearly, helpless child was a cowardice act. Not punishable by law, but cowardice. It is about respect for yourself and fellow man, and McQueary is seriously lacking in this department.
On different occasions throughout the GJT, members of the custodial staff at PSU saw Sandusky committing the acts in question, and although they reported them to their superiors they did nothing further when their superiors really did nothing further. They didn't commit a crime, but like McQueary they needed to do more. One of the custodians who alleged that Sandusky performed oral sex on a young boy can no longer testify because he suffers from Dementia…the plot thickens.
Penn State Board of Directors
The Penn State Board did the right thing in firing Paterno. They need to cleanse the entire football program. Everyone on the staff needs to be gone. It doesn't matter if they had nothing to do with it. If you want to show fans, boosters, and potential recruits that you mean business you need to purify the water at State. Anyone and anything affiliated with the former regime needs to go.
I also don't like that they played last Saturday or for the rest of the season. This is so far beyond football that they should not be playing. If the players had any integrity they wouldn't want to don the PSU colors either. This will affect players that have scholarships for the next year and incoming recruits. Most recruits were allowed to back out of PSU if they had already committed to PSU because JoePa is no longer going to be there. But the NCAA should allow the players to transfer to another school without affecting any of their eligibility statuses.
Conspiracy Theory(s)
Maybe I can answer, in part at least, the questions that Paterno should be answering
- Why was Sandusky still allowed to recruit for PSU? Paterno knew about everything from the start and is/was always very much affiliated with Sandusky. Maybe the totalitarian view is a lot closer to the truth than previously thought. I don't want to call PSU "the Mob" but maybe it's like that. Maybe Paterno is Corrado Soprano Jr. to Sandusky's Tony Soprano. These guys have a couple of legitimate-seeming ventures (PSU Football and Second Mile) but are doing the most odious acts behind closed doors that no one else knows about. Joe Paterno has a cult-like following, Penn State clearly was covering everything up for whatever was going on behind closed doors on the football team, and why would someone let a coach run a program for that long without 1, winning a national championship since 1986 and 2, if there wasn't something fishy going on in there the entire time?
- What exactly was said to Paterno by McQueary? Ultimately this is "he said, she said". But I bet McQueary was truthful when he went to Paterno back in 1998 but then realized the kind of world that he was getting into. Perhaps the reason that he didn't say anymore was due to one thing, Money. Penn State is a monolith. There is over 95,000 students enrolled at State College, that means if you multiply it by 20K (the median of in-state and out of state students, just for arguments sake) you're looking at a 190-million dollar establishment without even taking in what athletics or anything else is bringing into the school for money. So they could afford to offer McQueary some hush money, but now that everything else is coming out it's time for him to save face.
- Why not involve the police? Simple, money. JoePa was making more than just his salary, no doubt about it. He was getting whatever he wanted, when he wanted it, but involving the police would have crushed his operation with The Second Mile, which is a charity but is also bringing in plenty of money. If the accusation of "pimping out young kids" is true, you're looking at some of the most detestable stuff in the history of mankind, and what is worse yet, is that it was probably lining their pockets with more money than they could dream about. Because the warped individuals that would want to abuse these innocent children would pay a premium to do it and not be caught.
In summation, I hope this issue doesn't go to court. As people have seen with OJ and Casey Anthony all you have to do is put doubt in the mind of a jury that these acts took place and they will go scot-free. There is clearly a lot of money involved in whatever is going on here.
As if moral fiber wasn't already dwindling in this case, there's this excellent character whom is representing Jerry Sandusky. Jerry Sandusky's attorney clearly feels like he can plant that seed in a jury's mind for him to be able to plead absolute innocence, because he is going to have the "victim" in question from '98 up on the stand. How does a victim give his deposition in the GJT, then all of a sudden have a testimony that will credit Sandusky and damn the rest of the victims?
I'll let Randy Moss' words speak for me, "Straight cash, homie!"
Stay Tuned
Norton